3 ms·
I agree MM is more widespread, but I thought we were talking about new cabling (and I took that to include the transceivers). (Serial over fiber? Nice, didn't k
by Ao7bei3s 7y ago
I agree MM is more widespread, but I thought we were talking about new cabling (and I took that to include the transceivers). (Serial over fiber? Nice, didn't know that existed.)
Pricing-wise, what I meant is:
$18: 10G-SR (MM): https://www.fs.com/products/11552.html https://www.fs.com/products/11552.html
$24: 10G-LR (SM): https://www.fs.com/products/11555.html https://www.fs.com/products/11555.html
Compared to the cost of actually running the fiber through the building, that's not too bad for trunks. As I said, I don't mind multi-mode for the last hop, which is where price is a larger concern due to quantity. And in organizations where OEM pricing is used as baseline, relative to that a resourceful admin can go to single mode and still come out ahead (it's not a fair comparison, but reality in some places). Sure, things are probably different in an actual DC.
Direct attach is certainly cheaper (at first), but it can be a hassle compat wise, and I've never had quite the right length available. I can't speak to cooling, that's never been my department.
- angry_octet 7y agoWow those SR SFP prices have fallen. Every SFP adds about 1W, but 10Gb-T ports are particularly thirsty, they were 5W when first introduced, still in that ballpark. It all adds up. Another reason to prefer fiber/DA is 10Gb-T has shit latency, it has a modem doing QAM, hence the power consumption. Probably only relevant for HPC or HFT, but just inelegant.