3 ms·
The fact that it was written for humour not to mislead doesn't change the fact that it was exaggeration, and for sure I don't think anyone reading it thought yo
by corin_ 16y ago
The fact that it was written for humour not to mislead doesn't change the fact that it was exaggeration, and for sure I don't think anyone reading it thought you were genuinely trying to mislead people into thinking that companies were actually worth that much. But... it still invalidates the idea of there being no exaggeration ;)
- jaltucher 16y agoI guess if it were a computer program instead of an article it could be considered exaggeration.