3 ms·
> Part of the issue is that proprietary software would be running from a company that advertises itself as being oriented around free software. They're also ru
by scrollaway 7y ago
> Part of the issue is that proprietary software would be running from a company that advertises itself as being oriented around free software.
They're also running on Google's cloud, which is mostly proprietary software. And I can tell you right now they use the most-definitely-closed-source Salesforce for a lot of stuff.
Do you think there's actually a significant amount of people who care about the license type of the internal tools of the companies they use?
- gbear605 7y agoNone of that is frontend though, which is an important distinction.
- scrollaway 7y agoCan you explain to me why that's a distinction? If anything we're talking about frontend JS code that can be blocked by most adblockers/tracker blockers and thus will never touch your data, rather than the uncircumventable "your data is hosted on Google servers". And the latter does raise alarm bells for a tiny minority, but why would frontend be worse in that aspect?
- gbear605 7y agoWith frontend code, it’s code running on your machine that you can’t personally audit written by a company you don’t personally trust. For some situations (enterprises) and people (FOSS enthusiasts, paranoiacs), that’s not at all okay.