3 ms·

It wasn't a conspiracy theory. The Russians really did influence our election. The question of whether Trump was involved in the conspiracy too was answered by

It wasn't a conspiracy theory. The Russians really did influence our election. The question of whether Trump was involved in the conspiracy too was answered by Mueller, it was no, and now there is nothing to report. Ironically Trump is now in trouble with Ukraine for the very thing he was accused of doing with Russia, and he admitted it so no conspiracy theories.

a_tractor 7y ago
>It wasn't a conspiracy theory "Trump colluding with the Russians" absolutely was a conspiracy theory, why are you trying to deflect? >The Russians really did influence our election. To what extent was the outcome actually influenced by their efforts, again? Has there ever been proof that the Russian government hacked the DNC server beyond the evidence Crowdstrike, a Ukraine-affiliated 3rd-party forensics outfit hired by the DNC, was paid to provide? Did anybody besides Crowdstrike, like the FBI or the Special Counsel, actually investigate the DNC server itself, or verify the information provided by Crowdstrike in any way? Hint: the answer is no. To what extent does the entire narrative and resulting special council investigations depend upon information which was literally produced and paid for by Trump's political opponents? >Ironically Trump is now in trouble with Ukraine for the very thing he was accused of doing with Russia Trump's DOJ looking into the origin of the false Trump-Russia collusion narrative and finding Democrat-Ukraine collusion means its actually the Democrats who are "in trouble with Ukraine for the very thing [Trump] was accused of doing with Russia" by Democrats for the last 3 years. Or do you mean how Democrats are accusing Trump of the very thing Biden appears to have done to Ukraine while acting as VP? Because the appearance of actual quid pro quo, conflict of interest, and abuse of power by the former VP Biden, through his very public threats to withhold aid from Ukraine unless they fired their head prosecutor, who just so happened at that time to be leading a corruption probe into a company employing the VP's son, which was put to an immediate end by the Biden installed replacement doesn't suddenly become off-limits simply because Biden chose to run for President, just the opposite. Somebody who appears to have abused the power of a previously-held, less-powerful, elected position should not be trusted with more power, and that is where Biden stands right now and Democrat efforts to prevent a full investigation is hypocritical and deeply suspicious, not to mention desperate. >and he admitted it so Please. That is a gross distortion of the truth and you know it.

a_tractor 7y ago

>It wasn't a conspiracy theory "Trump colluding with the Russians" absolutely was a conspiracy theory, why are you trying to deflect? >The Russians really did influence our election. To what extent was the outcome actually influenced by their efforts, again? Has there ever been proof that the Russian government hacked the DNC server beyond the evidence Crowdstrike, a Ukraine-affiliated 3rd-party forensics outfit hired by the DNC, was paid to provide? Did anybody besides Crowdstrike, like the FBI or the Special Counsel, actually investigate the DNC server itself, or verify the information provided by Crowdstrike in any way? Hint: the answer is no. To what extent does the entire narrative and resulting special council investigations depend upon information which was literally produced and paid for by Trump's political opponents? >Ironically Trump is now in trouble with Ukraine for the very thing he was accused of doing with Russia Trump's DOJ looking into the origin of the false Trump-Russia collusion narrative and finding Democrat-Ukraine collusion means its actually the Democrats who are "in trouble with Ukraine for the very thing [Trump] was accused of doing with Russia" by Democrats for the last 3 years. Or do you mean how Democrats are accusing Trump of the very thing Biden appears to have done to Ukraine while acting as VP? Because the appearance of actual quid pro quo, conflict of interest, and abuse of power by the former VP Biden, through his very public threats to withhold aid from Ukraine unless they fired their head prosecutor, who just so happened at that time to be leading a corruption probe into a company employing the VP's son, which was put to an immediate end by the Biden installed replacement doesn't suddenly become off-limits simply because Biden chose to run for President, just the opposite. Somebody who appears to have abused the power of a previously-held, less-powerful, elected position should not be trusted with more power, and that is where Biden stands right now and Democrat efforts to prevent a full investigation is hypocritical and deeply suspicious, not to mention desperate. >and he admitted it so Please. That is a gross distortion of the truth and you know it.