3 ms·
> “The early-adopter travelers are already onto the next cool, cheap, relatively intact place,” Sheivachman says. Since the Skift article, the term has been wi
by ixtli 7y ago
> “The early-adopter travelers are already onto the next cool, cheap, relatively intact place,” Sheivachman says. Since the Skift article, the term has been widely applied to places like Barcelona, Venice, and Tulum to suggest that no one who’s in the know would want to go there anymore.
This might be true for certain countries who’s people have recently made a direct effort to subsidize tourism in an effort to increases it. But it’s just embarrassing to think anyone who is alive to comment now could claim to be an “early adopter” of a diverse and international city like Barcelona or Venice. These places have played host to cultural (and literal!) revolutions since before we were born and they’ll continue to do so after we’re all long dead, but perhaps there will always be someone to write a pretentious Vox article about how they know the real character of a city and others shouldn’t bother to try.
- ijpoijpoihpiuoh 7y agoI don't think that viewpoint (that Barcelona is played out and too mainstream) is at all the message of this Vox article. If anything, the article is a criticism of that viewpoint.
- ardit33 7y agoWhat? Barcelona is one of the most visited cities in Europe, to the point that they think to start limiting tourism. How is not that mainstream?
- ijpoijpoihpiuoh 7y agoBarcelona is mainstream, sure. That is an objective fact. But the person I responded to seemed to imply that the Vox article was making some sort of normative judgment about Barcelona. I don't think that any such judgment actually exists in the article.