3 ms·
[warning: biased, cynical and opinionated content ahead] To me this whole debacle feels like a forced error. Gitlab needs to find a way to profitability - fine
by bostik 7y ago
[warning: biased, cynical and opinionated content ahead]
To me this whole debacle feels like a forced error. Gitlab needs to find a way to profitability - fine, I am very much in favour.
But I can't shake the feeling that somewhere, someone, has made the mental association that "more user tracking == more money". It's worked for Google and Facebook, and it looks to be working for -vomit- modern infosec industry, where ever more aggressive end-user surveillance seems to be the easiest way to get two or even three bites of the apple.
And that is why this whole thing feels like a re-enactment of a South Park episode:
1. Get more user data
2. ???
3. Profit!
Because from what I have read so far in this thread and the early linked issue, it does feel like shoehorning invasive user tracking has been a foregone conclusion and figuring out a justification has come second.
- jefurii 7y agoLooks like it was forced on the devs by the CFO https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/merge_requests/14182#note_203849107 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/merge_requests/14182#no...
- jahlove 7y ago> Gitlab needs to find a way to profitability It's so much more than that. They need a way to justify their $2.75B valuation, and to keep going up. Profitability is a walk in the park in comparison.