3 ms·
It's more complicated than that though, because: 1. he may not be in a position of being able to leave easily after this long--a random example could be a sign
by spats1990 7y ago
It's more complicated than that though, because:
1. he may not be in a position of being able to leave easily after this long--a random example could be a significant other who does not speak English well.
2. the attitude this comment takes (and I've been living in Seoul for the last four years so I've spent a while thinking about this[1]) is absolutely unacceptable to most people if placed in a western context. Different race? He's a guest in their country!
What is it about East Asia that makes this attitude so tempting? is a question that doesn't let go once it gets its hooks into you. The ethnic homogeneity of Japan/Korea and to a lesser extent China must be a part of it. Race and the assumed privilege (privilege to leave, etc) of being a westerner also factors in.For example, things would be murkier if the author of the article were a labourer from SE Asia. But I haven't fully worked it out yet and maybe never will.
[1] Koreans don't do the empty seat thing when the train/bus is crowded. I'll also note that I've been an enthusiastic proponent of "if you don't like it leave" at various times, depending on the situation, and am not pretending to have all the answers.
- ddiq2 7y agoThere may be some cases where it's more complicated, but this isn't one of them. Japan is the country of the Japanese, and they have no obligation to even let this guy live in his country, much less put up with his whining.
- spats1990 7y agoOn the contrary, I believe that ethnonationalism is ethnonationalism no matter where you go, as are xenophobic attitudes. The difference lies in what outcomes these worldviews produce in the world. I'm happy to let this interaction end on that note, thanks.