4 ms·
Click bait. They're moving ten miles south of their current office . Their new location is not only outside SF but is in a different county. SSF is a distinct
by masonic 7y ago
Click bait. They're moving ten miles south of their current office .
Their new location is not only outside SF but is in a different county. SSF is a distinct city in San Mateo county.
- schoen 7y agoAll locations south of the City of San Francisco are in a different county!
- asveikau 7y agoHmm, the airport is technically part of the City and County, while distinctly being south of it.
- chondl 7y agoActually it is in San Mateo county. Wikipedia: "the airport is owned and operated by the City and County of San Francisco, despite it being located in San Mateo County."
- gibolt 7y agoPretty sure that was covered by the 'technically' part
- vinay427 7y agoThat's not what "technically" means. From the Wikipedia quote, it's literally not in the City and County of SF and is just owned by the government. It's very much south of the city because it's technically not in the city.
- tingletech 7y agoIs Hetch Hetchy technically part of the city and county of SF, even though it is in Yosemite?
- asveikau 7y agoThanks then for the correction. It is a little confusing for me that the city owns or administrates a number of sites outside of what we think of as "San Francisco". It's not been clear to me if you "re-enter San Francisco" when you go to those places. I figured yes. A number of them have signs posted at entry that the city owns it, so it feels like a natural conclusion to make, as if a "now entering..." sign.