3 ms·
Shouldn't it have been the state's burden to prove he was going to sell that to someone outside the state?
by conanbatt 7y ago
Shouldn't it have been the state's burden to prove he was going to sell that to someone outside the state?
- gamblor956 7y agoNo. The fact that he harvested way too much was all they needed to prove. He needed to prove it was all for his own private consumption and could not. Interestingly enough, he won at the trial level on different grounds (challenging the process by which the limit was set) but lost at the appellate level.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]