3 ms·

> Liveleak comes to mind as a service better suited for a public repository of this video. Liveleak, seriously? I'm not convinced that a site known for hosting

> Liveleak comes to mind as a service better suited for a public repository of this video. Liveleak, seriously? I'm not convinced that a site known for hosting gory and violent videos is really what these human rights activists are looking for. [Edit] Some context: https://www.businessinsider.com/profile-of-hayden-hewitt-founder-of-liveleak-2014-10 https://www.businessinsider.com/profile-of-hayden-hewitt-fou...

least 7y ago
It comes to mind for that very reason. The rules for uploading to it are less stringent than other services because it's there to provide a platform for things that don't fit on other video platforms on the web. If you're going to be hosting videos of the horrors of war, it's much more likely to stick on liveleak than any other platform.
- mindgam3 7y ago
  I agree that it works from a technology perspective, but from the product/marketing perspective it's a non-starter. People who want to watch violent videos != human rights activists. There's the "blood and gore" people, and the "social justice warrior" people, and not a ton of overlap. In order to solve this use case there would really need to be a site that combines LiveLeak's content moderation policy with an activist ethos.
  - least 7y ago
    The reason I'm suggesting it as an an alternative is because of its policies, not because the platform is a great place for discoverability. The intent isn't to help people find these videos, just that they are somewhere online where people can view them that's less likely to be taken down.
  - jxramos 7y ago
    Or at least with a filtered tag that's fairly reliable. All around a pretty risky site for this use case along other considerations.
mmjaa 7y ago
Liveleak very knowingly remove any content that will embarrass the US' military-industrial-pharmaceutical complex, also. So they're not really a great example.
naasking 7y ago
> I'm not convinced that a site known for hosting gory and violent videos is really what these human rights activists are looking for You mean gory and violent videos like war crimes and human rights violations? Sounds like exactly the right site.

least 7y ago

It comes to mind for that very reason. The rules for uploading to it are less stringent than other services because it's there to provide a platform for things that don't fit on other video platforms on the web. If you're going to be hosting videos of the horrors of war, it's much more likely to stick on liveleak than any other platform.

mindgam3 7y ago
I agree that it works from a technology perspective, but from the product/marketing perspective it's a non-starter. People who want to watch violent videos != human rights activists. There's the "blood and gore" people, and the "social justice warrior" people, and not a ton of overlap. In order to solve this use case there would really need to be a site that combines LiveLeak's content moderation policy with an activist ethos.
- least 7y ago
  The reason I'm suggesting it as an an alternative is because of its policies, not because the platform is a great place for discoverability. The intent isn't to help people find these videos, just that they are somewhere online where people can view them that's less likely to be taken down.
- jxramos 7y ago
  Or at least with a filtered tag that's fairly reliable. All around a pretty risky site for this use case along other considerations.

mmjaa 7y ago

Liveleak very knowingly remove any content that will embarrass the US' military-industrial-pharmaceutical complex, also. So they're not really a great example.

naasking 7y ago

> I'm not convinced that a site known for hosting gory and violent videos is really what these human rights activists are looking for You mean gory and violent videos like war crimes and human rights violations? Sounds like exactly the right site.