4 ms·
Yup, listen to this guy. I have the top of the line MacBookPro and Luminar is not even barely usable even with nothing else running on it. The features are ok,
by harshalizee 7y ago
Yup, listen to this guy. I have the top of the line MacBookPro and Luminar is not even barely usable even with nothing else running on it.
The features are ok, but it's basically an unusable product.
- missosoup 7y agoI mean, if it's using DNN then you're going to be pretty much shit out of luck for perf unless your machine has an nvidia graphics card right?
- eeeficus 7y agoIf you’re using pretrained models then they should run ok. It’s the same reason why Tensorflow runs on phones: to run models, not necessarily to train models. DNNs take a lot of time to train.
- missosoup 7y agoTF runs at seconds-per-frame speeds on phones without dedicated accelerators. Even inference is going to be slow when working on a 20 megapixel image. That's as much work as a 1220 sample batch at 128x128 resolution.
- chrischen 7y agoIf they are CPU throttled why not advertise egpu or igpu as requirement? I’m more curious if the results are as consistently good as advertised, as usually NN results are cherry picked for good ones.
- groby_b 7y agoOdd. Works relatively well on my 2014 MBP. (With LR running in the background, too) I mean, it goes further to your point -try it out. It seems that it depends _very_ much on the use cases.