3 ms·

I don't understand your business or deck. It seems like a chatbot...but maybe smarter...somehow? Because you're going to bring users into the loop...with thread

I don't understand your business or deck. It seems like a chatbot...but maybe smarter...somehow? Because you're going to bring users into the loop...with threads? But also you charge $99 per hour for developers? I don't get what the product is or the market or the opportunity... I'd recommend that you check out the AirBnB deck and then go back to your and simplify it: https://www.slideshare.net/PitchDeckCoach/airbnb-first-pitch-deck-editable https://www.slideshare.net/PitchDeckCoach/airbnb-first-pitch... Just my .02

atrilumen 7y ago
Thanks, Rabid. I know I'm not being clear. The goal is to present a magic software interface. I want to say, "forget about apps. What do you want to do? How can I help you?" ...and be an interface to the people who can make these things happen, whether it's location-based services, "business logic", or integrations with other platforms. I want to offer a service like Magic, for concierge, but include software development as one of those services. Lazily, on demand. Presenting everything in threads, including graphical elements, is what I see enabling this wizard of oz approach to creating new software on demand. It's also how I imagine eliminating the clutter of 'traditional' software. Instead of throwing a bunch of buttons, links, and menus at people and hoping they can navigate it... Slater just tells you what to do next, and never shows more than a small handful of choices at a time... and always gives you a way to ask for something different. And if it's something unexpected, it gets handled by a human, and that's how we learn what to build. If a human isn't available immediately, it will ask for permission to holler back later (push notifications, email, etc). I don't think words do it justice. I just have to show it. FML.

3 ms·

I don't understand your business or deck. It seems like a chatbot...but maybe smarter...somehow? Because you're going to bring users into the loop...with thread

by rabidonrails 7y ago

atrilumen 7y ago
Thanks, Rabid. I know I'm not being clear. The goal is to present a magic software interface. I want to say, "forget about apps. What do you want to do? How can I help you?" ...and be an interface to the people who can make these things happen, whether it's location-based services, "business logic", or integrations with other platforms. I want to offer a service like Magic, for concierge, but include software development as one of those services. Lazily, on demand. Presenting everything in threads, including graphical elements, is what I see enabling this wizard of oz approach to creating new software on demand. It's also how I imagine eliminating the clutter of 'traditional' software. Instead of throwing a bunch of buttons, links, and menus at people and hoping they can navigate it... Slater just tells you what to do next, and never shows more than a small handful of choices at a time... and always gives you a way to ask for something different. And if it's something unexpected, it gets handled by a human, and that's how we learn what to build. If a human isn't available immediately, it will ask for permission to holler back later (push notifications, email, etc). I don't think words do it justice. I just have to show it. FML.