5 ms·
To put some perspective on this, Intel's Marketing, general and administrative costs in 2018 were 6.7 billion[0] whereas AMD's net revenue was 6.4 billion[1].
by ultraism 7y ago
To put some perspective on this, Intel's Marketing, general and administrative costs in 2018 were 6.7 billion[0] whereas AMD's net revenue was 6.4 billion[1].
[0] https://s21.q4cdn.com/600692695/files/doc_financials/2018/Annual/Intel-2018-Annual-Report_INTC.pdf https://s21.q4cdn.com/600692695/files/doc_financials/2018/An...
[1] http://ir.amd.com/static-files/438f4934-2883-4c85-9193-d5218465c096 http://ir.amd.com/static-files/438f4934-2883-4c85-9193-d5218...
- flukus 7y agoAnd as a potential customer it's important to remember that you're the one paying that $6.7 billion.
- p1necone 7y agoI'm reminded of that any time I see cheap products with slick marketing (mostly fast food) - you have to assume they're cutting corners in their actual product to pay for all that graphic design and video editing.
- dpark 7y agoOr their revenue and income are so massive that taking a bit from it for advertising is a drop in the bucket. Intel has revenue of nearly 71 billion/year vs AMD at 6.5 billion.
- alimbada 7y agoThat may be true, but despite that they still cut corners. See Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities and the impact to the performance of Intel CPUs once mitigated. In fact, Intel recommended disabling HyperThreading if you want to be completely protected from the vulnerabilities.