10 ms·
> [...] The amortized cost per user would be very low after all, assuming this was used for automated mass surveillance. Honestly I think this is the total opp
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
> [...] The amortized cost per user would be very low after all, assuming this was used for automated mass surveillance.
Honestly I think this is the total opposite case. "Full take" collection systems are notoriously money pits due to the nature (hence, full take). Targeted surveillance will ALWAYS be far more cost efficient than blanket mass surveillance.
- fulafel 7y agoThis is much different from full take, as there is a well defined equation to be solved. There would be no need to store the traffic contents, just size+ timestamp + addrs, info that will compress very well.