4 ms·
If you insist on using journalism jargon, why not use it in its intended, original form? I for one am not a language purist, you can change expressions any way
by 99052882514569 7y ago
If you insist on using journalism jargon, why not use it in its intended, original form? I for one am not a language purist, you can change expressions any way you see fit but... I mean... The expression is still bury the lede.
- wccrawford 7y agoThe article they posted says that "lead" was the original form, and "lede" was introduced in 2008.
- 99052882514569 7y agoAs a standalone word, yes. The expression is, nevertheless, "bury the lede", and always* has been. * since the 1970s when it first surfaced.
- shkkmo 7y agoDo you have a reference for this? The linked article seems pretty clear that it is used both ways and "lead" is the original
- reaperducer 7y ago"Lead" is correct, and "lede" is journalism jargon. It was adopted in broadcasting circles to keep news readers from saying "lead" (as in the element) instead of "lead" (as in to follow). Source: Journalism degree, communications degree, 20 years in broadcast news.