3 ms·
...-in the creators opinion, for the tasks that it solves for them
by satanspastaroll 7y ago
...-in the creators opinion, for the tasks that it solves for them
- gnode 7y agoI think it's difficult to read "the one programming language that's close to being flawless", without interpreting it as being someone's opinion. Reading the article though, I'd say a good objective argument is made that Fexl is "flawless", insofar as it being the "thinnest possible functional programming layer on top of C." Whether that's useful or good is another matter.
- karmakaze 7y agoThese being equivalent: (a (b (c (d (e (f x)))))) (a; b; c; d; e; f x) Is not required so isn't the thinnest possible layer. Whether it's preferable to a homoiconic s-expr is subjective.