3 ms·
I surely won't recommend Nvidia for anything Linux these days. Get a decent AMD card. That said, Nvidia should work with Wine too. Most problems with Wine are c
by shmerl 7y ago
I surely won't recommend Nvidia for anything Linux these days. Get a decent AMD card. That said, Nvidia should work with Wine too. Most problems with Wine are caused by missing dependencies, like 32-bit libraries that are often needed for 32-bit games naturally.
- CallMeMarc 7y agoYes, that's what I've learned on the way but back as a bought my Thinkpad I didn't think about stuff like this as I also initially ran Windows
- arvinsim 7y ago> I surely won't recommend Nvidia for anything Linux these days Probably not an option for serious compute work that relies on CUDA. EDIT: Compute, not computer.
- shmerl 7y agoDidn't AMD plan to provide CUDA shim, that works for their ROCm? Besides, you shouldn't be using CUDA lock-in to begin with.
- arvinsim 7y ago> Didn't AMD plan to provide CUDA shim, that works for their ROCm? Can't find any new developments on that > Besides, you shouldn't be using CUDA lock-in to begin with. For some teams, not choosing CUDA is a luxury they don't have.
- blaser-waffle 7y agoNvidia with the binary-blob drivers are fine. Not great, but fine. Some updates broke things and required work but got em fixed. That said, looking at AMD for the next (linux) build, both in CPU and graphics card.
- shmerl 7y agoI wouldn't call them fine if you consider general progress of the Linux desktop. Their integration with the whole stack is simply broken, due to Nvidia refusing to upstream their drivers. It's the reason they for years couldn't support PRIME (Optimus) and Wayland use cases, and despite their very slow efforts to address that, a lot of it is still broken for their blob (like XWayland use case). Basically, if you care about the progress of the Linux desktop, don't use Nvidia, since it's only holding it back.