5 ms·

I’ve also stopped “check[ing] weekly for new things”, but that’s because I don’t need any new things! Do you? I don’t have Instagram but I imagine it’s a bit l

I’ve also stopped “check[ing] weekly for new things”, but that’s because I don’t need any new things! Do you? I don’t have Instagram but I imagine it’s a bit like the App Store. I’m waiting somewhere. I’m bored. I know, I’ll check for a shiny thing. Oh, no shiny thing. That was disappointing. To compare, do you go to the internet regularly and check for new things? I don’t think this is the App Store’s fault. It’s not on Apple to constantly put new shiny useful software in the App Store — it’s on developers. And I’m not blaming developers. Making new shiny software is hard. There’s already a whole bunch of software. If you have a problem, chances are it’s already been addressed. Constantly shiny + new ~== a good App Store. (~== Not necessarily equal to. Did I just invent that?)

dijit 7y ago
I mean "need" is subjective, I was trying to insinuate that I didn't know I 'needed' what was on offer until it was displayed in front of me. For (a good) instance of what I mean was Airmail. Standard mail on OSX was "good enough" but Airmail was just all around better (from a UX perspective) and the popularity of it made Apple turn their head. Another was 1password; before 1password I was using the macOS keychain, but 1password is/was all around better.
- jen729w 7y ago
  Funnily enough, I started using Airmail a few months ago, and just today I've started moving back to Mail.app which is, indeed, good enough. In the end I found Airmail a little heavy. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
platistocrates 7y ago
~ means "approximately".
- ljcn 7y ago
  ~= means not equal in MATLAB. Also it often means one's complement (C and others). Hence the gp used it to mean NOT.
  - s_y_n_t_a_x 7y ago
    Lua as well (uses ~= instead of !=).
mcphage 7y ago
> To compare, do you go to the internet regularly and check for new things? Isn't that what this site is?
- jen729w 7y ago
  But this is shiny new knowledge. God help us if that ever dries up.
Humdeee 7y ago
> (~== Not necessarily equal to. Did I just invent that?) Instead of inventing new operators in your sentences, you can also just stick with plain English
- Tronno 7y ago
  On HN I occasionally see programming conventions used in otherwise normal writing. E.g. "at $big_corp we like to use $process". I can't stand it. It's the linguistic equivalent to wearing a bowtie and pocket protector.
  - reaperducer 7y ago
    Almost as bad as people on HN who start each comment with "I mean" or end each question with "no?"
  - lliamander 7y ago
    Hey man. Bow ties are cool.
ninju 7y ago
> (~== Not necessarily equal to. Did I just invent that?) Yeah... in most programming languages it would be shiny + new <> a good App Store OR shiny + new != a good App Store The ~= (single equals) is used to for equal to with a regular expression on right side
lliamander 7y ago
Modal logic captures the concepts of "necessity" and "possibility" nicely[1]. You could express it as "~□(shiny + new -> good app store)" which translates into "it is not necessary that shiny and new implies a good app store". [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modal_logic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modal_logic

dijit 7y ago

I mean "need" is subjective, I was trying to insinuate that I didn't know I 'needed' what was on offer until it was displayed in front of me. For (a good) instance of what I mean was Airmail. Standard mail on OSX was "good enough" but Airmail was just all around better (from a UX perspective) and the popularity of it made Apple turn their head. Another was 1password; before 1password I was using the macOS keychain, but 1password is/was all around better.

jen729w 7y ago
Funnily enough, I started using Airmail a few months ago, and just today I've started moving back to Mail.app which is, indeed, good enough. In the end I found Airmail a little heavy. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

platistocrates 7y ago

~ means "approximately".

ljcn 7y ago
~= means not equal in MATLAB. Also it often means one's complement (C and others). Hence the gp used it to mean NOT.
- s_y_n_t_a_x 7y ago
  Lua as well (uses ~= instead of !=).

mcphage 7y ago

> To compare, do you go to the internet regularly and check for new things? Isn't that what this site is?

jen729w 7y ago
But this is shiny new knowledge. God help us if that ever dries up.

Humdeee 7y ago

> (~== Not necessarily equal to. Did I just invent that?) Instead of inventing new operators in your sentences, you can also just stick with plain English

Tronno 7y ago
On HN I occasionally see programming conventions used in otherwise normal writing. E.g. "at $big_corp we like to use $process". I can't stand it. It's the linguistic equivalent to wearing a bowtie and pocket protector.
- reaperducer 7y ago
  Almost as bad as people on HN who start each comment with "I mean" or end each question with "no?"
- lliamander 7y ago
  Hey man. Bow ties are cool.

ninju 7y ago

> (~== Not necessarily equal to. Did I just invent that?) Yeah... in most programming languages it would be shiny + new <> a good App Store OR shiny + new != a good App Store The ~= (single equals) is used to for equal to with a regular expression on right side

lliamander 7y ago

Modal logic captures the concepts of "necessity" and "possibility" nicely[1]. You could express it as "~□(shiny + new -> good app store)" which translates into "it is not necessary that shiny and new implies a good app store". [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modal_logic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modal_logic