3 ms·
"I would consider that low value content" It's actually high value content (from a monetary perspective) otherwise Demand Media wouldn't be creating it. Low q
by drm237 16y ago
"I would consider that low value content"
It's actually high value content (from a monetary perspective) otherwise Demand Media wouldn't be creating it. Low quality, high value. Spam is something else entirely.
- danilocampos 16y agoI think implicit in that remark is "low value to most people." It may be "high value" to the scummy people who create it but I can't say their value is of much interest to me or anyone else trying to find useful information.
- davidhollander 16y ago>It's actually high value ... Low quality, high value. Spam is something else entirely It's not high value from a monetary perspective either. It's low value, high volume. And anything low-value and untargetted enough IS spam. I would quantify value of an informational chunk by viewing it as a signal and measuring the degree of data compression present. For example, a Groupon listing has extremely high value as it compresses all of the economic data in an entire city to a single very best coupon at a rate of one per day. The only difference between spam, ads, and content is the probability that the degree of compression or informational value they offer is greater than the attentional resources required to absorb it. The threshold values between categories vary person to person of course.