5 ms·
Blind auditions are one technique I push as an alternative to just selecting people based on their attributes. The authors just shredded one study. Given size o
by nickpsecurity 7y ago
Blind auditions are one technique I push as an alternative to just selecting people based on their attributes. The authors just shredded one study. Given size of HN, it's survey time: what are all the good studies you know of it working, not working, etc?
- blast 7y agoThis was a replication attempt that came up with the opposite results: https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A77108 https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A77108
- belorn 7y agoAre you asking for technique for hiring processes or employee retention? From observation, I see very fair hiring process in companies that treat employees as replaceable cogs that get trained, used and within a few years replaced. One place that I know which operate like that has equal hiring ratios, gender ratio of almost 50/50, pays exactly the same for both women and men, and are extremely unflexible in terms of work hours, task selection/satification and pay. As a result they also have a very high churn rate.
- AstralStorm 7y agoNot sure if shredded. The author detected no significant bias in blind auditions due to gender. This may or may not mean that blind auditions are more effective in equalizing opportunities - are fair.
- weberc2 7y agoHow could it mean that blind auditions are fairer if it didn’t detect a gender bias signal to begin with? Genuine question?