3 ms·
The problem here is that these manufacturers sell knives which, when configured by a jealous partner, can automatically stab the cook who's using them to chop v
by frandroid 7y ago
The problem here is that these manufacturers sell knives which, when configured by a jealous partner, can automatically stab the cook who's using them to chop vegetables.
The manufacturer should make it obvious to the cook that their knife has been modified that way.
It is quite clear in this case that the app developer has developed the app to obfuscate this configuration, and thus shares in the responsibility.
- bendbro 7y agoNo, this is again an incorrect analysis. In my example, the knife is the app. In your example, the knife is the phone. In my example, the sued knife manufacturer is the app developer. In your example, the sued knife manufacturer would have to be the Mobile Phone creator. You intended for it to be the App Developer. Regardless, much like the point of a knife is to stab, the point of a tracking app is to surreptitiously track. When a murderer uses a knife to stab a human, the murderer is at fault. When a stalker uses a tracking app to stalk, the stalker is at fault. Not the creator of the knife and not the creator of the tracking app.