The reason I stopped reading is that the author didn't care enough to find out why the birds even have a protected area to begin with. His argument basically bo

The reason I stopped reading is that the author didn't care enough to find out why the birds even have a protected area to begin with. His argument basically boiled down to "the birds can move" and he didn't appear to have done basic research to understand why they can't. If he's not going to dig into one of his major premises then it's not a very strong argument to be making and I think I'm better off moving on. That's why.