4 ms·

I must be misunderstanding your comment. Are you advocating for the government to take a land owner’s property without any recourse? The land owner is given no

• marcinzm 7y ago
  Roads are generally not controlled or owned by the adjacent landowners but rather the government. Although do let me know if it's different in London.
• ItsDeathball 7y ago
  Even if the subject weren't publicly owned land, the implication would be the opposite, that landowners should control their own land and not everything around it that doesn't belong to them.
• gumby 7y ago
  Yes, you misunderstood the comment to which you were replying. Public roadways serve more than just the properties adjacent to them. People should not be downvoting your comment.
• dwoozle 7y ago
  Sure, it’s called eminent domain, the land owner has no recourse but they do get compensated, and it’s an almost universal concept.