3 ms·
> You may not like certain specifics of their employee healthcare policy, but having such a policy does not imply hate on their part I personally disagree, and
by mmanfrin 7y ago
> You may not like certain specifics of their employee healthcare policy, but having such a policy does not imply hate on their part
I personally disagree, and I disagree strongly.
- TimTheTinker 7y agoYou're saying that in order to enact such a policy, a person would have to feel "intense or passionate dislike" for certain people. I don't see the logical connection between the two. Could you explain how the one implies the other?
- mmanfrin 7y agoHow on earth did you get that from what I said? I think they are a hateful group because they so vehemently wanted to deny medical access through their mandated healthcare program.
- TimTheTinker 7y ago> How on earth did you get that from what I said? You said you disagree with my statement that "having such a policy does not imply hate on their part" -- which I take to mean you think having such a policy does imply hatred. I just repeated that, but replaced the word "hate" with its definition -- "feeling intense or passionate dislike for (someone)". > I think they are a hateful group because they so vehemently wanted to deny medical access through their mandated healthcare program. You're using emotionally loaded terms that assume a particular attitude on their part. My point is that if you don't start by assuming any particular attitude and evaluate their actions alone, those actions don't necessarily imply an intense dislike for anyone (i.e. hatred).