4 ms·
The beauty of his "con" is that he did it all in plain view and tacit approval by the board. He didn't need to do anything criminal when he's controlling the co
by mikeryan 7y ago
The beauty of his "con" is that he did it all in plain view and tacit approval by the board. He didn't need to do anything criminal when he's controlling the company's voting shares.
- johannes1234321 7y agoEven if he owned the majority vote and posts the minor share holders or lenders can demand "proper" business conduct. But getting thorough a court case can be quite an effort and be risky.