4 ms·
The political hurdle to a carbon tax has nothing to do with Exxon's lobbyists. Politicians are scared shitless of raising gas prices. When France tried to do
by travisoneill1 7y ago
The political hurdle to a carbon tax has nothing to do with Exxon's lobbyists. Politicians are scared shitless of raising gas prices. When France tried to do it recently it caused massive riots.
- vkou 7y agoFrench riots were caused by a large number of things, but the pro-global warming lobby managed to focus public anger on the carbon tax, instead of all the other causes for their economic woes. Mailing each man, woman, and child two equal cheques, with the words 'CARBON PROPSPERITY TAX', one at Christmas, and one at Thanksgiving would very quickly turn public opinion towards a carbon tax.
- dontreact 7y agoThis is brilliant. A progressive enough government could even give people “a free trial” of a carbon tax by having this part of it kick in a few months before the tax starts, with the check explaining what the money was coming from.
- jfengel 7y agoIt wouldn't be as easy as that. A carbon tax will result in higher prices of a lot of goods, including food: anything that has to be shipped has some carbon built into the price, and farming uses a lot of oil-fuelled machines. It wouldn't necessarily be a large increase, but it would make a potent talking point against it. Even if you got it passed, they would see prices rise before the "carbon prosperity check" arrived. It's a good idea even though there are more difficulties than I mentioned. But it's not an easy sell.
- dontreact 7y agoAre you really going to claim that the fossil fuel industry’s massive lobbying effort has had no impact on fossil fuel subsidies or taxing carbon? You think it’s entirely due to gas prices? If you or anyone could prove this, they would be in a position to save the fossil fuel industry massive amounts of money (and therefore probably also figure out a way to get a cut of that).