4 ms·
Your use of "primary" paints in a worse light than it really is. From the quote it sounds like they don't use it period for advertising
by sidibe 7y ago
Your use of "primary" paints in a worse light than it really is. From the quote it sounds like they don't use it period for advertising
- etiam 7y agoI'm inclined to think I just added some honesty. When they've used it in their 'research and development to better understand your preferences and offer you better services' or whatnot, do you seriously believe that isn't to interact with ad targeting and all the other ways they use the models?
- shaki-dora 7y agoWell if you're inclined to just make stuff up to fit you narrative, then I can see why you'd have problems trusting others.
- etiam 7y agoDid I ask you for an amateur shrink evaluation? Aspersions aside you have a point about the risk for confirmation bias, but that goes for conserving overly credulous attitudes as well. Everyone can make up their own minds about how to fill the blanks in how Google really handles this data but the track record isn't great for straightforward honesty there.
- dang 7y agoThat crosses into personal attack. Please follow the site guidelines. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- SAI_Peregrinus 7y agoCurrently. And no current plans to change in the future. But they could change their plans. It's not a "no advertising as long as you keep paying", it's "no advertising as long as we feel like it."