3 ms·

https://www-m.cnn.com/2017/07/05/us/hobby-lobby-ancient-artifacts-trnd/index.html https://www-m.cnn.com/2017/07/05/us/hobby-lobby-ancient-arti... The company i

• jandrese 7y ago
  Was the founder just using the company as a front to collect dubiously legal artifacts perhaps? Basically as a way to insulate himself behind his company in case some irate government came looking for them.
  • mey 7y ago
    Considering the relation between Hobby Lobby (father) and the Museum of the Bible (son), I would be shocked if there was any corporate veil left intact on the Hobby Lobby side. It is a private entity, so not sure the shareholders have much desire to complain about the running of the organization. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Green_(entrepreneur) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Green_(entrepreneur) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobby_Lobby_smuggling_scandal https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobby_Lobby_smuggling_scanda... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_of_the_Bible https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_of_the_Bible
  • JAlexoid 7y ago
    Don't they have a status of "closely held"? As in - they definitely should be liable for criminal actions in the name of the company. Otherwise it's not "closely held"