No, that is not the issue. That's just a Gish gallop-like defense coughed up now. It's not true that you have to limit harm to the government's taste in order

No, that is not the issue. That's just a Gish gallop-like defense coughed up now. It's not true that you have to limit harm to the government's taste in order to be considered a journalist, and it's not true that Assange did not try to limit harm either. > Those sort of subtleties are important when you're going to be arguing in front of a judge. Not in front of this judge. If there's one thing the case against Assange hasn't been, it's subtle!