4 ms·
set -e is not a bashism, but people who reach for it are extremely likely to write bash-only code. That's just been my experience. And I'm not your "bro".
by Annatar 7y ago
set -e is not a bashism, but people who reach for it are extremely likely to write bash-only code. That's just been my experience.
And I'm not your "bro".
- mlyle 7y agoCute backtracking. :) It's fun to watch you squirm and try and come up with a narrative where the laughable things you've said are justified. I've learnt a lot from you. The original Bourne shell didn't support set -e. set -e is a bashism. Depending on a posix shell is unreasonable. This has something to do with Linux. Wait, none of these things are true. > because on Solaris /bin/sh is the real McCoy - Steven Bourne's shell from 1972 - 1977. vs. v7 Linux from 1977-1978 including set -e. You're hilarious, bro.
- Annatar 7y agoFor all I know, you could have made all that shit up. I see no reason to believe you or trust what you wrote there. I know I got busted by set -e or else I wouldn't have brought it up. It's that simple and no amount of trolling me will change that. I don't have Alzheimer's just yet. And I'm not your "bro". Are you in need of an older brother so badly?
- mlyle 7y agoIt's readily verified. I even pasted the original code, bro. Or you can login to a unixv7 system here, in browser: https://unix50.org/ https://unix50.org/ Takes 30 seconds.. Disabling XQ boot Boot : hp(0,0)unix mem = 2020544 # RESTRICTED RIGHTS: USE, DUPLICATION, OR DISCLOSURE IS SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS STATED IN YOUR CONTRACT WITH WESTERN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. WED DEC 31 19:15:05 EST 1969 login: root Password: You have mail. # set -e # true # false login:
- Annatar 7y agoI'm not your "bro", as much as you'd like me to be.