That was my first thought, but apparently it's seven! http://humanstxt.org/humans.txt http://humanstxt.org/humans.txt No wonder they're looking for a standard

That was my first thought, but apparently it's seven! http://humanstxt.org/humans.txt http://humanstxt.org/humans.txt No wonder they're looking for a standard way to structure author information - they're generating so much of it that it'll soon become unweildy.