> Peer review is a lowest level quality mark for a piece of science. Peer reviewed used to be the epitome of proof, now it's been relegated to base minimum? A

> Peer review is a lowest level quality mark for a piece of science. Peer reviewed used to be the epitome of proof, now it's been relegated to base minimum? Are you saying that consensus is no longer considered valid proof? (not that I disagree, it's just that this is a rare argument in my experience)