2 ms·
> Well, for one, that would vastly reduce economic growth. Yes, that's the point! I take the world without the economic growth where people are happy with what
by praptak 7y ago
> Well, for one, that would vastly reduce economic growth.
Yes, that's the point! I take the world without the economic growth where people are happy with what they have over one with economic growth and unsustainable level of CO2 emissions.
- eng888888 7y agoNot to start an argument, but that's easy to say when you have a comfortable life and already experienced abundance. You know, people of poor and underdeveloped countries have the right to aspire to a better life (and yes, that means owning more than a couple of ragged t-shirts and eat meat often than twice a month)
- throwaway66920 7y agoSure, me too. But historically, and also literally right now, lack of economic growth leads to revolutions and protest if people are poor.