4 ms·
Actually the New Yorker article has this sentence which is ignored by tuaw: Another Web site, Salary List, quotes a substantially higher figure—$107,719—but th
by davidmathers 16y ago
Actually the New Yorker article has this sentence which is ignored by tuaw:
Another Web site, Salary List, quotes a substantially higher figure—$107,719—but that doesn’t appear to include people working at Apple’s more than three hundred retail stores.
And this disclaimer at the top:
One word of warning, though. What follows should be considered a process of me thinking out loud, and pointing out some things that strike me, rather than reaching any definitive conclusions.
And, oh yeah, it doesn't have a misleading link-bait headline either. There's actually nothing at all embarrassing about the New Yorker article. Tuaw just pulled a quote out of context and turned it into an inane blog post.
- jhamburger 16y agoWell the blog post is much worse, but the $46,000 number is worthless if it's just the average of jobs with "apple" in the description, It really shouldn't be included for any reason in the New Yorker post.