If it actually works in humans, and I have the gene in question (both of which I doubt are true in actuality), then unequivocally yes, even if the side effects

If it actually works in humans, and I have the gene in question (both of which I doubt are true in actuality), then unequivocally yes, even if the side effects were extremely severe. > What are the ethics applications of using a treatment like this on people who are so deeply impacted by autism that they can't meaningfully give consent? What are the ethics of fixing broken bones in infants who can't meaningfully give consent?