> Good conversation piece, everyone has an opinion on the subject, but the experiment is rubbish. Agreed. The paper also seems to be promoting a view of wealt

> Good conversation piece, everyone has an opinion on the subject, but the experiment is rubbish. Agreed. The paper also seems to be promoting a view of wealth inequality that would support modern socialist policies. The paper seems to be trying to scientifically support redistribution of welfare, without actually doing or saying anything, or posing the question directly. Someone is warping the numbers to fit their agenda. Since it's a popular (and polarizing) agenda, of course everyone will have an opinion to chime in with.