4 ms·
>Solaris was the most influential Unix of the 90’s so its omission is curious. I think you meant 2000s because in the 90s Solaris was nothing special. All the
by xeeeeeeeeeeenu 7y ago
>Solaris was the most influential Unix of the 90’s so its omission is curious.
I think you meant 2000s because in the 90s Solaris was nothing special. All the interesting stuff (zones, SMF, dtrace, ZFS) was introduced in Solaris 10, which was released in 2005.
- flowerlad 7y agoNo I meant the 90’s. Solaris was the top platform for dotcom startups in the 90’s. By 2001-2002 the dotcom crash had happened. By the time the “interesting stuff” you mention were added, Solaris was waning in popularity.
- ncmncm 7y agoTrue enough. But when it was big, it was nothing special. 2.2 (2, in the final number scheme) was pretty crashy. One would not expect a Bell Labs person to find a SysV variant interesting. As I recall, solarix had Doors by 2001, but I can't remember what it was. Solarix probably deserves mention if Tru64 nee OSF/1 did. Ah, the Unix Wars: Sunview vs. Motif, buggy vs. ugly.
- lonelappde 7y agoWindows 95 was buggy too, but a history of OSes would be silly to leave it out
- ncmncm 7y agoBuggy and ugly. But not Unix.