3 ms·
Language changes. Hackers generally aren't "people who use things in unintended ways" anymore either, but evil criminals on computers.
by pgeorgi 7y ago
Language changes. Hackers generally aren't "people who use things in unintended ways" anymore either, but evil criminals on computers.
- perl4ever 7y agoWell, yeah, it does, but that's an odd example I can't say I agree with. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Lifehack https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Lifehack
- pgeorgi 7y agoThat's because of the subculture here. This is "hacker news" after all ;-) https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hacker https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hacker has the "illegal entry to computers" angle in both #1 (besides "somebody who cuts down vegetation") and #4. Day-to-day use of hacker, e.g. in the news, also concentrates on that (like on https://edition.cnn.com/search?q=hacker https://edition.cnn.com/search?q=hacker). There are subcultures that keep the original meaning of meritocracy alive, but like with "hacker" that train has left the station a long time ago.
- perl4ever 7y agoNo, come on, I didn't hear about "lifehacks" here, I heard about it on other non-computer related sites where people were making fun of how stupid they were. So I think that means the whole concept was invented to appeal to people even dumber than the average person, which is evidence completely un-HN type people have some sense of hacking as being positive. It's not like the positive sense is unrelated to the negative sense either. A clever shortcut/trick/program could be illegal or unethical or not depending on context.