> as well as subjugating their population with backward, barbaric laws, to this day. > Was it Prince Harry or Prince William that ordered the Saudis to slaugh

> as well as subjugating their population with backward, barbaric laws, to this day. > Was it Prince Harry or Prince William that ordered the Saudis to slaughter a journalist in a foreign embassy? What are you even talking about? This is very simplistic reasoning. The British have always been involved in Saudi politics since the founding of the Saudi state, and to this day. Just because they don't order direct execution of individuals does not mean disgusting crimes were not committed. Not to mention that it's not just the British that were and are messing with the politics of the Middle East to this day (does Sykes–Picot ring a bell?)