4 ms·
I think that is pretty criminal already. Basically: 1- Nord falsely blames its server provider. 2- Nord hides it from their users. 3- Nord claims all will b
by rasengan 7y ago
I think that is pretty criminal already.
Basically:
1- Nord falsely blames its server provider.
2- Nord hides it from their users.
3- Nord claims all will be well with an “audit” (again, since they were already “audited”)
This is either criminal negligence, “security theater”, or both.
- metalliqaz 7y ago> Nord falsely blames its server provider. I don't see anything in the article about those claims being false. Where did you get that?
- CorruptedArc 7y agoFrom the article: "“One of the data centers in Finland we are renting our servers from was accessed with no authorization,” said NordVPN spokesperson Laura Tyrell." I believe that would be the section they're referencing.
- biddlesby 7y agoHow does this quote demonstrate that the service provider was not at fault?
- rasengan 7y ago“We failed by contracting an unreliable server provider...” They are casting blame on the provider. Providing remote access tools is not a fault. Failure by NordVPN to disable said access is the issue, yet they passed the blame on.
- metalliqaz 7y agoOkay that makes sense. I read differently, like they had fabricated the story about the service provider's management console.