I have literally just quoted the original article and the current data. I didn't state any opinion but apparently this is enough for people to disagree. I thin

I have literally just quoted the original article and the current data. I didn't state any opinion but apparently this is enough for people to disagree. I think it is interesting in itself to read predictions made thirty years ago for the next thirty years and compare them with actual data. What I get from it is that the analysis was fundamentally correct- temperatures have kept increasing; but I also see a tendency to overconfidence and exaggeration: the source says that the most conservative estimates put the warming by 2018 between 1 and 7 degrees- even if it's Fahrenheit it literally means that we're at the lower end of the "most conservative estimates".