3 ms·
That's super interesting. I wonder if they have moved to use SMBv3? I really liked the direction with Nano in 2016, but I guess it makes more sense as a contai
by youdontknowtho 7y ago
That's super interesting. I wonder if they have moved to use SMBv3?
I really liked the direction with Nano in 2016, but I guess it makes more sense as a container OS. Still, the latest version is what a lot of people wish they could start an operating system with. NT kernel, no wmi, no servicing, no activation.