> does Elm not having type classes is actually a feature that boosted its success I dont think so. It did help make errors very straight forward and prolly als

> does Elm not having type classes is actually a feature that boosted its success I dont think so. It did help make errors very straight forward and prolly also keeps compile times low. The author's stubbornness is, in my view, more in that he does not support (actually prevents where he can) making Elm usable outside of the browser (like what Node did to JS).