3 ms·
>considering that Elm seems to be by far the most stable, usable and used alternative I wonder, does Elm not having type classes is actually a feature that boo
by UserIsUnused 7y ago
>considering that Elm seems to be by far the most stable, usable and used alternative
I wonder, does Elm not having type classes is actually a feature that boosted its success, or is it just missing because of the author stubbornness ?
I think Elm did right into focusing in SPA rather than being yet another language compiling to JS.
- cies 7y ago> does Elm not having type classes is actually a feature that boosted its success I dont think so. It did help make errors very straight forward and prolly also keeps compile times low. The author's stubbornness is, in my view, more in that he does not support (actually prevents where he can) making Elm usable outside of the browser (like what Node did to JS).