3 ms·
It really isn't. It's quite obviously possible and not worth the effort if you happen to know anything about Rubik's cubes and neural networks. In fact, I woul
by solveit 7y ago
It really isn't. It's quite obviously possible and not worth the effort if you happen to know anything about Rubik's cubes and neural networks.
In fact, I would be much more interested in "I solved a Rubik's cube using a computer" because you can then talk about the mathematics of a Rubik's cube (presumably the algorithm used is a human-comprehensible one), while for "I solved a Rubik's cube using a neural network" the only sensible question is "and how badly did you have to overfit to do that?"
- thaumasiotes 7y agoYou can assume the "computer" solution is overfitted, too. There's no reason to, because general methods are well-known, but it's even easier to just hardcode a cube and the list of moves that solves it than it is to implement one of those general methods. Why assume that "I solved a Rubik's cube using a neural network" guarantees that I cheated?