Ha ha, agreed that is a useful distinction. I confess to not reading the article... But at some level I think only considering personal gain is negative Other

Ha ha, agreed that is a useful distinction. I confess to not reading the article... But at some level I think only considering personal gain is negative Otherwise we would say tobacco companies weren't negative to surpress evidence of cancer... Just because they want to sell cigarettes Are coca-cola undermining the common ground? If they openly try to resolve these issues, I don't think anyone would call it negative -- I want coca-cola to be their own main advocates for improvement