> Uh... the headline of the article was literally "Solving Rubik’s Cube with a Robot Hand". Which part of that statement isn't true? You read that headline on

> Uh... the headline of the article was literally "Solving Rubik’s Cube with a Robot Hand". Which part of that statement isn't true? You read that headline one way. Myself another. When someone actually reads the article (a lost art now) you get full context in case there was any confusion. I'd argue that calling OpenAI misleading (in this instance) is even more misleading. From Marcus's Tweet I assumed that he had problems with OpenAI's actual claims. Nope. He just didn't like the headline.