Coyne, a Darwinist, discusses the Cambrian explosion as not being quite what creationists claim: it would be improbable for such fecundity of life to have occur

Coyne, a Darwinist, discusses the Cambrian explosion as not being quite what creationists claim: it would be improbable for such fecundity of life to have occurred in the timeframe observed. This argument is refuted by Prothero [1]. Furthermore, the statistical incongruity seems like a red herring, and has been answered repeatedly [2]. Even if it still does not add up, I would argue that it’s not necessary to thump scriptures as a credible biological reference. [1] https://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/13-08-07/ https://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/13-08-07/ [2] https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/341/6152/1344.1.full.pdf https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/341/6152/1344.1.f...