What an atrocious article, exemplifying and worsening the problem it claims to discuss. It starts out with a bit about the importance of dialogue and how bad p

What an atrocious article, exemplifying and worsening the problem it claims to discuss. It starts out with a bit about the importance of dialogue and how bad polarization is. Then immediately switches to automatically, and totally assuming that anyone who opposes current immigration levels is simply a "racist". No discussion. Clearly the author thinks the problem isn't polarization. The author thinks the problem is the other side, and uses words literally synonymous with evil to refer to them. This kind of journalism isn't discussing the problem; it is the problem.