4 ms·
That seems somewhat absurd. It's far more likely that they did it simply to reduce costs and increase hiring
by RhodesianHunter 7y ago
That seems somewhat absurd. It's far more likely that they did it simply to reduce costs and increase hiring
- dadarepublic 7y agoWhy not both? Why not do a thing that has multiple benefits? If doing something to my advantage, also has a side effect that is also to my advantage seems like even more of a reason to do that something.